0.09/0.09	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_8109 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.09/0.10	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.09/0.30	% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
0.09/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.09/0.30	% WCLimit    : 180
0.09/0.30	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:59:22 EDT 2023
0.09/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.39	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HOSBBDQGma/Vampire---4.8_8109
0.14/0.40	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.14/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHSA.
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# lpo8_s with pid 8289 completed with status 0
0.14/0.41	# Result found by lpo8_s
0.14/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHSA.
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,6,20000,1.0)
0.14/0.41	# Search class: HGUSS-FFSF21-SHSFMSBN
0.14/0.41	# partial match(3): HGUSF-FFSF21-SSSFFSBN
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 109s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# post_as_ho12 with pid 8291 completed with status 0
0.14/0.41	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.14/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHSA.
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,6,20000,1.0)
0.14/0.41	# Search class: HGUSS-FFSF21-SHSFMSBN
0.14/0.41	# partial match(3): HGUSF-FFSF21-SSSFFSBN
0.14/0.41	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 109s (1) cores
0.14/0.41	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.14/0.41	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.14/0.41	
0.14/0.41	# Proof found!
0.14/0.41	# SZS status Theorem
0.14/0.41	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.14/0.41	thf(decl_22, type, c0: iS).
0.14/0.41	thf(decl_23, type, cJOIN: iS > iS > iS > $o).
0.14/0.41	thf(decl_24, type, cP: iS > iS > iS).
0.14/0.41	thf(decl_25, type, cS_JOIN_CLOS: iS > (iS > iS > iS) > (iS > iS > iS > $o) > $o).
0.14/0.41	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_1: (iS > $o) > iS).
0.14/0.41	thf(decl_27, type, esk2_1: (iS > $o) > iS).
0.14/0.41	thf(decl_28, type, esk3_0: iS).
0.14/0.41	thf(cS_JOIN_CLOS_def, axiom, ((cS_JOIN_CLOS)=(^[X1:iS, X2:iS > iS > iS, X3:iS > iS > iS > $o]:(((![X4:iS]:((X3 @ X4 @ X1 @ X4))&![X5:iS]:((X3 @ X1 @ X5 @ X5)))&![X4:iS, X5:iS, X6:iS, X7:iS, X8:iS, X9:iS]:((((X3 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)&(X3 @ X7 @ X8 @ X9))=>(X3 @ (X2 @ X4 @ X7) @ (X2 @ X5 @ X8) @ (X2 @ X6 @ X9)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HOSBBDQGma/Vampire---4.8_8109', cS_JOIN_CLOS_def)).
0.14/0.41	thf(cTHM580_pme, conjecture, ((((![X4:iS, X5:iS]:(((cP @ X4 @ X5)!=(c0)))&![X4:iS, X5:iS, X7:iS, X8:iS]:(((((X7)=(X8))&((X4)=(X5)))<=((cP @ X4 @ X7)=(cP @ X5 @ X8)))))&(cS_JOIN_CLOS @ c0 @ cP @ cJOIN))&![X10:iS > $o]:((((X10 @ c0)&![X4:iS, X5:iS]:((((X10 @ X4)&(X10 @ X5))=>(X10 @ (cP @ X4 @ X5)))))=>![X4:iS]:((X10 @ X4)))))=>![X4:iS]:((cJOIN @ X4 @ X4 @ X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HOSBBDQGma/Vampire---4.8_8109', cTHM580_pme)).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_2, plain, ((cS_JOIN_CLOS)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:iS, Z1:iS > iS > iS, Z2:iS > iS > iS > $o]:(((![X4:iS]:((Z2 @ X4 @ Z0 @ X4))&![X5:iS]:((Z2 @ Z0 @ X5 @ X5)))&![X4:iS, X5:iS, X6:iS, X7:iS, X8:iS, X9:iS]:((((Z2 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)&(Z2 @ X7 @ X8 @ X9))=>(Z2 @ (Z1 @ X4 @ X7) @ (Z1 @ X5 @ X8) @ (Z1 @ X6 @ X9)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cS_JOIN_CLOS_def])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(((((![X4:iS, X5:iS]:(((cP @ X4 @ X5)!=(c0)))&![X4:iS, X5:iS, X7:iS, X8:iS]:((((cP @ X4 @ X7)=(cP @ X5 @ X8))=>(((X7)=(X8))&((X4)=(X5))))))&((![X22:iS]:((cJOIN @ X22 @ c0 @ X22))&![X23:iS]:((cJOIN @ c0 @ X23 @ X23)))&![X24:iS, X25:iS, X26:iS, X27:iS, X28:iS, X29:iS]:((((cJOIN @ X24 @ X25 @ X26)&(cJOIN @ X27 @ X28 @ X29))=>(cJOIN @ (cP @ X24 @ X27) @ (cP @ X25 @ X28) @ (cP @ X26 @ X29))))))&![X10:iS > $o]:((((X10 @ c0)&![X4:iS, X5:iS]:((((X10 @ X4)&(X10 @ X5))=>(X10 @ (cP @ X4 @ X5)))))=>![X4:iS]:((X10 @ X4)))))=>![X4:iS]:((cJOIN @ X4 @ X4 @ X4)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM580_pme]), c_0_2])])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X30:iS, X31:iS, X32:iS, X33:iS, X34:iS, X35:iS, X36:iS, X37:iS, X38:iS, X39:iS, X40:iS, X41:iS, X42:iS, X43:iS, X44:iS > $o, X47:iS]:(((((((cP @ X30 @ X31)!=(c0))&((((X34)=(X35))|((cP @ X32 @ X34)!=(cP @ X33 @ X35)))&(((X32)=(X33))|((cP @ X32 @ X34)!=(cP @ X33 @ X35)))))&(((cJOIN @ X36 @ c0 @ X36)&(cJOIN @ c0 @ X37 @ X37))&(~(cJOIN @ X38 @ X39 @ X40)|~(cJOIN @ X41 @ X42 @ X43)|(cJOIN @ (cP @ X38 @ X41) @ (cP @ X39 @ X42) @ (cP @ X40 @ X43)))))&((((X44 @ (esk1_1 @ X44))|~(X44 @ c0)|(X44 @ X47))&((X44 @ (esk2_1 @ X44))|~(X44 @ c0)|(X44 @ X47)))&(~(X44 @ (cP @ (esk1_1 @ X44) @ (esk2_1 @ X44)))|~(X44 @ c0)|(X44 @ X47))))&~(cJOIN @ esk3_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk3_0))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS, X10:iS > $o]:(((X10 @ (esk2_1 @ X10))|(X10 @ X1)|~((X10 @ c0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS]:((cJOIN @ c0 @ X1 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS, X10:iS > $o]:(((X10 @ (esk1_1 @ X10))|(X10 @ X1)|~((X10 @ c0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS]:(((cJOIN @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))))|(cJOIN @ X1 @ X1 @ X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS]:(((cJOIN @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))))|(cJOIN @ X1 @ X1 @ X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_6])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS, X10:iS > $o]:(((X10 @ X1)|~((X10 @ (cP @ (esk1_1 @ X10) @ (esk2_1 @ X10))))|~((X10 @ c0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS, X4:iS, X5:iS, X6:iS, X7:iS, X8:iS]:(((cJOIN @ (cP @ X1 @ X6) @ (cP @ X4 @ X7) @ (cP @ X5 @ X8))|~((cJOIN @ X1 @ X4 @ X5))|~((cJOIN @ X6 @ X7 @ X8)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS]:((cJOIN @ X1 @ c0 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (cJOIN @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ (esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0))))), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (cJOIN @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:iS]:((cJOIN @ Z0 @ Z0 @ Z0))))), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~((cJOIN @ esk3_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X1:iS]:((cJOIN @ X1 @ X1 @ X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12])]), c_0_13]), c_0_14])])).
0.14/0.41	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])]), ['proof']).
0.14/0.41	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.14/0.41	# Parsed axioms                        : 7
0.14/0.41	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
0.14/0.41	# Initial clauses                      : 10
0.14/0.41	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.14/0.41	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
0.14/0.41	# Processed clauses                    : 64
0.14/0.41	# ...of these trivial                  : 5
0.14/0.41	# ...subsumed                          : 12
0.14/0.41	# ...remaining for further processing  : 47
0.14/0.41	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 36
0.14/0.41	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.14/0.41	# Backward-subsumed                    : 10
0.14/0.41	# Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.14/0.41	# Generated clauses                    : 326
0.14/0.41	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 230
0.14/0.41	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.14/0.41	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.14/0.41	# Paramodulations                      : 224
0.14/0.41	# Factorizations                       : 24
0.14/0.41	# NegExts                              : 0
0.14/0.41	# Equation resolutions                 : 63
0.14/0.41	# Total rewrite steps                  : 47
0.14/0.41	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.14/0.41	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.14/0.41	# Current number of processed clauses  : 24
0.14/0.41	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
0.14/0.41	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.14/0.41	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.14/0.41	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
0.14/0.41	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43
0.14/0.41	# ...number of literals in the above   : 124
0.14/0.41	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.14/0.41	# Current number of archived clauses   : 23
0.14/0.41	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 38
0.14/0.41	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
0.14/0.41	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
0.14/0.41	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
0.14/0.41	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.14/0.41	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 22
0.14/0.41	# BW rewrite match successes           : 13
0.14/0.41	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.14/0.41	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.14/0.41	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 21362
0.14/0.41	
0.14/0.41	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.41	# User time                : 0.015 s
0.14/0.41	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.14/0.41	# Total time               : 0.017 s
0.14/0.41	# Maximum resident set size: 1952 pages
0.14/0.42	
0.14/0.42	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.42	# User time                : 0.016 s
0.14/0.42	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.14/0.42	# Total time               : 0.019 s
0.14/0.42	# Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
0.14/0.42	% E---3.1 exiting
0.14/0.42	EOF